Thursday, March 29, 2012

Ammunation

Though we all have the fundamental right to bear arms, I think people should only be able to own guns unless they can prove they can be responsible with weapons. I'm just one of those people who thinks that guns are better off in the hands of professionals or those who have been trained in handling a gun of any kind. Just because you own a gun does not mean you know hoe to use it correctly and that can be as dangerous as the criminals people are trying to protect themselves from.

I remember seeing a story on the news about a student in Colorado who was able to have a concealed weapon on campus at college. In a sense, I understand because of the kind of crimes that are prevalent on campuses such as robbery and rape. I believe that lethal force in self defense should only be used as a last resort, but in the heat of the moment, anything could happen, just so long that it was in complete self defense, I can't stress that enough

Wednesday, March 28, 2012

Firearm Laws

I think that Firearms should only be used by police officers and others with a license that represents one's ability to properly wield a gun.  Such a powerful weapon can make deciding when to use it a very tough thing, since death is such a common result, if not intention, of a gun's use.  So, police officers on duty should be allowed to use their firearm in the situations they have been trained to use them in.  I think that is appropriate.  As for personal use by any other adult... One should only use a firearm when on their own property, and only in the case of self defense. However, I do not support carrying a concealing weapon into a public restaurant or other venue such as a school.

I agree with the Castle doctrine, which states that deadly force is justifiable "when the actor reasonably fears imminent peril of death or serious bodily harm to himself or another".  

Thursday, March 22, 2012

My Reflection
1. I believe everyone did their fair share and I think because of the cooperation and hard work on everyone's part made the difference. On a scale of 1to 10, I would say that everyone deserves a 10.
2. I wouldn't remove any member of the group; we all work very well together.

Showing Up - 10
Fair Share - 10
Responding to Emails and Communication - 9
Handling Conflict - 10
Being Present -10

An effective group is a group understands that:
1) everyone is entitled to an opinion
2) cellphones should only be used for class related reasons
3) Show up to the group meetings on time and ready
4) don't leave your other group mates hanging,
5) brainstorm your ideas

Group Success!!

1. I am very impressed with my group. We all did our fair share and pulled together an excellent presentation--10's for every member.

What impressed me the most was the high levels of motivation and the creativity of work from each member. We all had that common desire to nail the midterm, and we did. Nice job guys!

2. We Need More Members! We are only three at the moment but we hope to get more. For new members, I would like to see the same motivation, creativity, and work ethic my group has already.

3. We were originally four, but one dropped. So, for the remaining three:

A. 10 - Showing up
B. 10 - Doing your fair share
C. 9.5 - Being on time
D. 9.5 - Responding timely to email and communicating effectively with other members
E. 10 - Handling conflict among group members
F. 9.5 - Being present in the group -- not distracted by outside cell phone calls or text messages when the group is meeting.

There is a little polishing to do but, overall, we work very well together.

4.     The elements of an effective group:
        i.    Communication
        ii.   Motivation
        iii.  Respect
        iv.  Leadership
        v.   Creativity

Article on Group Management

Tuesday, March 20, 2012

Dynamics of the Midterm Preparation and Presentation

1.  Aside from a completely absent member for the whole of the Midterm's preparation and presentation, I would say that my group worked very well together.  We organized meetings at the FLC library during the week leading up to the presentation, and used other effective methods of communication and teamwork to accomplish our goals.  I think Jeff, Chris, and I all contributed our fair share.  Jeff made sure that everything was accomplished in a timely manner, and would give the final word as to weather or not a certain section of our presentation was well-prepared.  I would say I contributed as much as my two partners did during this project's preparation. The score I would give myself is a 9.  I would take a point because of my shifty approach to public speaking;  it's not my thing, but I am working on it!


2. I would remove the absent member, but the one's who participated all did a good job and I think that the three of us worked well together. Adding a member would only be beneficial, increasing the speed at which research can be done on any given topic.  If the added member did not meet expectations, it still would not have done a great amount of harm, and would not do so in the future.  


3. Rating the workplace expectations 
A.  Showing up - 9 - thanks to Google Docs and other means of communication such as Skype and Facebook's Group function, our group has always been able to easily communicate with each other during most times of the day, all days of the week.  I felt a little hesitation the night before the presentation in regards to completion of the slide, but everything worked out and the slide show was ready by 9AM.  
B.  Doing your fair share - 9 - as I said in 1) above, everyone did great and found useful data to share. 
C.  Being on time - 10 - All three of us were able to respond to question via facebook in a timely manner.  Our sole Skype meeting went as planned.  The library meetings went as planned as well.  Flawless victory.  
D.  Responding timely to email and communicating effectively with other members - 10 - Yes.  I feel I answered this in A) and C)
E.  Handling conflict among group members - 10 - No conflict that had any lasting effect on the quality of our presentation. 
F.  Being present in the group -- not distracted by outside cell phone calls or text messages when the group is meeting. - 8 - Some Facebook browsing here and there during Library time, but it was nearing the end of our meeting and things had been going well up to this point.  I considered this to be acceptable downtime however!



My five rules for having an effective group:
1. Communicate often with members to ensure that goals are clearly understood.  
2. Respectively speak out if you think there is a problem, sooner rather than later.  
3. Use Google Docs, the "Share" function made this project extremely simple, and in my opinion very effective as a presentation.  
4. Take advantage of modern technology.  Social networking makes for easy communication.  Facebook Group Chat is the next best thing to Skype voice calls.  Use both.  
5. Start preparation the day before you think you should. 


Here is the article I picked.  It has great tips that I agree with completely.  The article recognizes that being able to work in groups is an important skill.  It may be an unavoidable for many College students, such as the one's who take this specific class, so learning it is extremely important in order to earn the grade and to learn to be a more successful and confident person.

Thursday, March 15, 2012

Wisconsin Assembly Approves Wolf Hunting


A gray wolf near Wisconsin Dells, Wis.Associated PressA gray wolf near Wisconsin Dells, Wis.
Green: Politics
Less than two months after wolves in the Great Lakes region were removed from the federal endangered species list, the Wisconsin State Assembly approved a bill on Wednesday that would open the way for a wolf hunting and trapping season.
The bill, supported by hunting groups, Republicans and some Democrats, passed by a 69-25 vote. It was opposed by environmental groups and the Great Lakes Indian Fish and Game Commission, which represents Ojibwe tribes in Wisconsin, Michigan and Minnesota. The tribes have significant rights in wildlife management in much of the area where wolves are found and said they were not consulted on the hunting plans as required by a treaty. State wildlife biologists also criticized various elements of the bill.
The measure now goes to Gov. Scott Walker.
A number of Democrats spoke Wednesday against the bill and sought amendments, denouncing it as “very irresponsible and anti-science.” No Republicans spoke for the bill or against the amendments.
Seven proposed amendments failed to win approval. Most were intended to soften the bill, which would allow hunting at night with dogs, lights and traps. One amendment, offered by a Democrat who cast it as a jobs measure, would have required that hunters eat the wolves they killed, supposedly creating some additional jobs for butchers and chefs.
The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources would have the leeway to decide how many licenses to issue for the hunting season, which would run from mid-October through the end of February.

My View: The issue of hunting wolves has been a touchy subject in the hunting world. There are valid reasons on both sides of the debate of hunting; however, wolves have been on the endangered species list for some time now, and as soon as there's a healthy population, we decide its OK to kill some. The money generated from the hunting season could help in the smaller communities that pepper the surrounding wolf territories; however, it seems the cost might be too high. 

Medical Marijuana in the United States

Medical Marijuana Presentation

Since California's Proposition 215 passed in 1996, medical marijuana has been on the rise.  Now, sixteen states and Washington D.C. have adopted their own laws allowing those with a doctor's recommendation to use marijuana for various reasons.  I support those who want to use marijuana for medicinal purposes.  The proven analgesic effects can be effective in those with chronic pains.  Marijuana can even alleviate nausea and stop vomiting in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.  Due to it's schedule in the CSA, there has been an underwhelming amount of research done, and this is preventing marijuana from getting the positive attention it deserves.  Pharmaceutical companies already prescribe Marinol, which also contains THC, to those with the symptoms listed above.  It seems like the only difference between Marinol and Marijuana is who is profiting on the distribution.


Wednesday, March 14, 2012

Midterm - Medical Marijuana

Our group has been working extensively on our midterm. We have prepared a slide show, which is linked below, for our midterm presentation.

Slide Show Presentation

Thursday, March 8, 2012

Cost of Gene Sequencing Falls, Raising Hopes for Medical Advances


MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif. — In Silicon Valley, the line between computing and biology has begun to blur in a way that could have enormous consequences for human longevity.
Ramin Rahimian for The New York Times
Complete Genomics has produced more than 3,000 sequences at about $5,000 each this year.

Readers’ Comments

Bill Banyai, an optical physicist at Complete Genomics, has helped make that happen. When he began developing a gene sequencing machine, he relied heavily on his background at two computer networking start-up companies. His digital expertise was essential in designing a factory that automated and greatly lowered the cost of mapping the three billion base pairs that form the human genome.
The promise is that low-cost gene sequencing will lead to a new era of personalized medicine, yielding new approaches for treating cancers and other serious diseases. The arrival of such cures has been glacial, however, although the human genome was originally sequenced more than a decade ago.
Now that is changing, in large part because of the same semiconductor industry manufacturing trends that opened up consumer devices like the PC and the smartphone: exponential increases in processing power and transistor density are accompanied by costs that fall at an accelerating rate.
As a result, both new understanding and new medicines will arrive at a quickening pace, according to the biologists and computer scientists.
“For all of human history, humans have not had the readout of the software that makes them alive,” said Larry Smarr, director of the California Institute of Telecommunications and Information Technology, a research center that is jointly operated by the University of California, San Diego, and the University of California, Irvine, who is a member of the Complete Genomics scientific advisory board. “Once you make the transition from a data poor to data rich environment, everything changes.”
Complete Genomics, based in Mountain View, is one of more than three dozen firms hastening to push the cost of sequencing an entire human genome below $1,000. The challenge is part biology, part chemistry, part computing, and in Complete Genomics’ case, part computer networking.
Complete Genomics is a classic Silicon Valley start-up story. Even the gene sequencing machines, which are housed in a 4,000-square-foot room bathed in an eerie blue light, appear more like a traditional data center than a biology lab.
In 2005 ,when Clifford Reid, a successful Silicon Valley software entrepreneur, began to assemble his team, he approached Dr. Banyai and asked if he was interested in joining a gene sequencing start-up. Dr. Reid, who was also trained in physics and math, had spent a year as an entrepreneur-in-residence at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, where he had become a convert to bioinformatics, the application of computer science and information technologies to biology and medicine.
Dr. Banyai had even less experience in biology.
Formerly with the Internet networking start-ups GlimmerGlass and Silicon Light Machines, he in turn began by reading a pioneering 2005 article in the journal Science in which a group of researchers in George Church’s genetics laboratory at Harvard describe a new technique intended to speed gene sequencing.
Today Dr. Banyai is finishing the second generation of a machine that blends robotics, chemistry, optics and computing. It is emblematic of the serendipitous changes that take place when a manufacturing process is transformed: performance increases and cost falls at an accelerating rate.
“Genomes are now being sequenced incredibly cheaply,” said Russ B. Altman, who is a founder of Personalis, a start-up based in Palo Alto, Calif., that is developing software to interpret genomes. “On the discovery and science side we will be able to do clinical trials. We’ll be able to check the entire genome.”
Recently, on the company’s Web site, Dr. Reid predicted that the cost of gene sequencing could eventually be as low as that of a blood test: “I believe that the impact on the medical community of whole human genome sequencing at a cost comparable to a comprehensive blood test will be profound, and it will raise a host of public policy issues (privacy, security, disclosure, reimbursement, interpretation, counseling, etc.), all important topics for future discussions,” he wrote.

MY VIEW
This process could usher in a new era of medical advancements in not just America, it redefine the idea of our pursuit of happiness. Imagine our country full of people who could live longer and healthier than ever before being able to spend more time in their lives bettering themselves and their communities. With the potential of bringing new ways of combating AIDS and cancer, it's very possible that this could bring in a paradigm shift in views towards cigarette smoking and sexual promiscuity. It's a long shot, but hey, anything is possible.

Study: Diesel fuels can cause cancer in miners

After a 17-year legal battle with the mining industry, a study was released yesterday showing that the diesel fuels that miners often come into contact with can increase their risk of lung cancer by three fold. The Mining Awareness Resource Group have battled with scientific organizations attempting to study the effects of diesel fuels on the lungs since the early nineties.  The recent study released is more comprehensive than those that came before it, showing more proof in it's conclusion.  This is a private dispute between the MARG and scientists researching the effects of diesel fuels.  MARG is attempting to protect the mining business from recieving more government regulation, while scientists are trying to reveal the damaging effects and make it clear to miners that they are at risk of developing lung cancer.

ARTICLE

Wednesday, March 7, 2012

Is Alternative Energy the Solution?


Can alternative energy effectively replace fossil fuels?
In the U.S., we have an abundance of naturally occurring resources in coal and oil. These resources have raised the standard of living and fueled our society for decades. But the future of conventional sources of energy is uncertain.
Al Gore and President Obama have both said that the continual use of fossil fuels will result in a global warming disaster and they encourage us to turn to alternative sources of energy. But the fact of the matter is, there are experts on both sides of this issue and we don’t know with certainty if this claim is true or not. Carbon emissions from human activity constitute less than 5 percent of the total emissions released from oceans and land. Some experts contend that temperature rises are due to a natural cycle of warming and cooling, not humans.
Alternative energy is underdeveloped and expensive—solar and wind costing two to four times more than coal and oil. It is simply not practical to pursue alternative energy if it is not competitive in the market.
In 2010, the federal government spent $66 billion on clean energy. Forcing expensive energy will worsen the economy and impede recovery.
Due to more state and federal regulations, the coal and oil industry is safer, cleaner, and more efficient than ever before. We can rely on coal and oil until the technology is developed that will make clean energy competitive. I hope to see a future where society is powered by solar and wind, but I can't see it happening today.

Laws:
Federal spending
State and federal regulations on oil and coal industries

Players:
            Federal and state governments
            Coal and oil industries
            Clean energy proponents and industries

Interests:
            Cheap energy
            Clean energy

Please leave a comment with your opinion!

For more information on energy (and many other issues): http://alternativeenergy.procon.org/